Blade of Tradition in the Name of Religion, coordinated and supervised by Kameel Ahmady, examines male circumcision in Iran through participants’ experiences and its cultural, religious and social settings.
The book questions the normalisation of interventions in children’s bodies and examines consent, adult authority, social pressure and economic interests. Its ethical arguments concern bodily autonomy and the ability to make informed decisions.
Participants, methods and research dates
The completed Farsi introduction describes qualitative field research and purposive interviews with circumcised Iranian participants living inside and outside Iran, alongside specialists and other informed contributors.
It gives an overall research period of Solar Hijri years 1398–1401, with some fieldwork in 1399–1400. These source-calendar dates are retained without treating the book’s 2023 publication year as the interview date.
The eight-chapter structure
The book addresses the research problem; concepts and procedures; historical and geographical contexts; religion; scientific and disciplinary approaches; factors sustaining the practice; lived experiences; and conclusions and recommendations.
Its coverage includes medical, anthropological, psychological, social and legal perspectives. Those different kinds of argument need to be assessed using evidence appropriate to each question.
Interpreting experiences and figures
Participants’ accounts help explore meanings, experiences and social pressures. They do not establish that everyone undergoing circumcision has an identical outcome.
Any charts of participants’ religion, ages or views describe the study sample unless a different basis is explicitly established. They should not be presented as national prevalence or population-wide opinion.
Consent, authority and critical interpretation
The author examines how expectations of religious or community membership, gender roles and adult authority can influence decisions. Economic interests and access to information also form part of the critique.
The book’s ethical and legal arguments are the author’s position; they do not establish a single legal rule for every country or a medical outcome for every individual. Read specific claims with their supporting sources. NHS information provides a separate clinical reference.
Common questions
Is the book a population survey of all Iranian men?
The described qualitative, purposive study should not be treated as nationally representative.
How should accounts of health or psychological effects be read?
Assess the evidence for each specific claim and distinguish individual narratives, ethical arguments and clinical findings.
Where can I find available editions?
Use the access links above, checking the language, format and imprint of the file you choose. The title and page numbers in your citation should match that edition.
Essential cookies are active for the website to work. Visitor statistics and external content such as YouTube depend on your choice. You can accept or reject optional cookies, or choose your settings. You can change your choice through “Cookie settings”.
Essential
Always active
Essential storage needed to provide services and remember your cookie choice is always active.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Visitor statistics
This option allows Google Analytics to measure visits and use of the website.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
External content
This option allows external content such as YouTube to load. These services process information under their own policies.